"Since most white collar crime is done by European Americans, everyday, then why not start randomly checking the books of companies, corporations, and banks?"
Dear friends,
The argument regarding the "Stop and Frisk" tactics of urban police is concentrated on, especially, young African American and Latino males existing in an aura of suspicion that surrounds them. But do the aforementioned tactics violate "racial profiling" statutes? And do the authorities care, anyway?
Moreover, as far as suspicion goes, perhaps, the relevant question is, "Since most white collar crime is done by European Americans, everyday, then why not start randomly checking the books of companies, corporations, and banks?" In other words, why is there greater concern for people stealing $20 from a person walking down the street, than for those who constantly steal millions from tens of thousands of retirement funds and the like?
Nevertheless, some complain of police bullying, while others are rightly concerned about the psychological affects on the victims of unnecessary Stop & Frisk practices. And, does being a "white" cop make one feel like a superior being to those who do not claim that moniker? What about a non-European American cop who doesn't even have any history in this country?
Such is the case with an honorary "white" NYPD officer named Kha Dang. It reminds me of the Black overseers on enslavers' plantations. Please check out the link below.
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/10/judge-questions-efforts-of-nypds-stop-and-frisk-all-star-kha-dang-who-was-wrong-wrong-95-percent-of-the-time/
Monday, May 13, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment