...please imagine how many people would be living healthy and properous lives today, if we did not live in a country where, every single day, whether through shootings or drunk drivers, people kill their fellow citizens for no reason...
Dear friends,
During this entire presidential campaign season, the issue of "health care" has been brought up incessantly. The focus has been on the different strategies that candidates have dreamed up for realizing "universal" or some other kind of wide-ranging insurance coverage for all Americans. The most crucial aspect of the plans have been based upon a universal ability of citizens to be able to pay for their health insurance.
Many years ago, as an agent for what, at the time, was the most prosperous insurance agency in the nation (operating out of Philadelphia), I learned first-hand that "insurance companies love to collect premiums, but hate to pay claims". Yet, that simple truism points to a much deeper issue that neither candidate seems to be addressing. It is: Our health care is an industry not a "system". In other words, health workers do not work in unity for a specific purpose like better health for all citizens. Rather, they are separated from each other by competing business organizations - both government-sponsored and private, that are replete with televison commercials and newspaper advertisements.
So what is our health care industry other than that which represents the aggregate of businesses that belong to that particular trade? Of course, the actual purpose of any business, if that entity plans to be operating for a long time, is to create customers - not "maximize profits". It is here that HMOs and other bodies ruin hospital and other institutions that choose to have a more lasting affect upon the welfare of the ctizenry.
Still, at face value, all of this seems quite noble, that is, universal health care. However, neither candidate has talked about health care in the context of how people will be able to live healthy and productive lives. I am especially stressing this point, because in our society, mental life is not considered as important as its physical counterpart. Yet, it is the lack of good mental health that is at the basis of many of our problems in society.
For instance, please imagine how many people would be living healthy and properous lives today, if we did not live in a country where, every single day, whether through shootings or drunk drivers, people kill their fellow citizens for no reason. They kill strangers, over road-rage. They kill strangers, because they need money. People kill their entire families or a group of their co-workers, because they are angry. They sell food, in abundance, that they know is unhealthy. They sell cars that emit poisonous gases and can barely last for a few years. They make movies that promote inhumaity and cowardice, and glorify murder - and rape. They promote songs and music that promote hatred and intolerance. The list goes on and on...
Greed, amongst some in our society, that is being so proudly attacked by John McCain - a man who owns seven homes - is certainly a mental health issue. We have known for some time that the miser, for example, tries to "feel better" about himself or herself, by hoarding things, in order to make up for his or her otherwise bad feelings about himself or herself which is caused by a lack of self-worth. Moreover, both power and sexual greed are at the basis of all social relationships, in ths market-based society of "supply and demand", from sexual harrassment at work - to rape and incest.
At any rate, while I have mentioned his name on this blog on, at least, a couple of occasions, I am now actually presenting some of his work. Paul Krugman of the New York Times is always someone worth reading, whether you agree with him or not. Still, regardless of whatever Krugman and others have to say, I can still hear the refrain sung by the great Curtis Mayfield, "Depression is part of my mind, the sun never shines, on the other side of town..." As the jargon goes: Let's keep it real. Peace.
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/opinion/06krugman.html?ei=5070&emc=eta1
Read full post
Friday, October 10, 2008
McCain's $300 Million Mortgage Crisis Plan
Dear friends,
At the recent second debate between Senators Barack Obama and John McCain, the latter promised that he has constructed a $300 million plan to help citizens who are homeowners be able to remain in their homes, while having lower payments...
That is not a plan; rather, it is an ambition. After all, he did not even specify, region- or income level-wise, exactly who will actually receive aid. As well, he made no mention of either administrative or legal costs for lawyers and other representatives who will need to broker with the banks on behalf of the aforementioned homeowners.
Nonetheless, let us do some simple math. Suppose both the administrators and lawyers will work for free. Also, let us suppose that there are 100, 000 homeowners who need assistance, as opposed to the real number which is, currently, far greater. That means that each person will receive $3, 000 in aid (by dividing $300 million by 100, 000). Will that amount of money last long enough to insure that the homeowners will remain solvent? It seems that McCain is just trying to buy votes, at this point.
G. Djata Bumpus
Read full post
At the recent second debate between Senators Barack Obama and John McCain, the latter promised that he has constructed a $300 million plan to help citizens who are homeowners be able to remain in their homes, while having lower payments...
That is not a plan; rather, it is an ambition. After all, he did not even specify, region- or income level-wise, exactly who will actually receive aid. As well, he made no mention of either administrative or legal costs for lawyers and other representatives who will need to broker with the banks on behalf of the aforementioned homeowners.
Nonetheless, let us do some simple math. Suppose both the administrators and lawyers will work for free. Also, let us suppose that there are 100, 000 homeowners who need assistance, as opposed to the real number which is, currently, far greater. That means that each person will receive $3, 000 in aid (by dividing $300 million by 100, 000). Will that amount of money last long enough to insure that the homeowners will remain solvent? It seems that McCain is just trying to buy votes, at this point.
G. Djata Bumpus
Read full post
Dowd on McCain/Palin Desperation
Dear friends,
Now comes John McCain, a longtime mover and shaker in Congress who knows how to "reach across the isle". He is a "maverick" who having been in office during, several recessions, now, conveniently, claims that he knows how to solve our problems...
If that is true, then, I must ask the "maverick" senator, "After your great experiences of having been in office during a number of recessions, while always "reaching across the isle", what has happened between the time that you were nominated by the Republican Party - and now, that, apparently, did not occur to you during the prior quarter of a century, that has made you so wise and capable?".
At any rate, I have been reading Maureen Dowd's work for a number of years. I find her to be one of the nation's most distinguished journalists, male or female. Her voice seems to shun whatever is the favored position of the "herd" (whch includes many of her journalistic colleagues). Please enjoy Maureen's, as usual, thoughtful piece, on the link below.
Cheers!
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/08/opinion/08dowd.html?ei=5070&emc=eta1
Read full post
Now comes John McCain, a longtime mover and shaker in Congress who knows how to "reach across the isle". He is a "maverick" who having been in office during, several recessions, now, conveniently, claims that he knows how to solve our problems...
If that is true, then, I must ask the "maverick" senator, "After your great experiences of having been in office during a number of recessions, while always "reaching across the isle", what has happened between the time that you were nominated by the Republican Party - and now, that, apparently, did not occur to you during the prior quarter of a century, that has made you so wise and capable?".
At any rate, I have been reading Maureen Dowd's work for a number of years. I find her to be one of the nation's most distinguished journalists, male or female. Her voice seems to shun whatever is the favored position of the "herd" (whch includes many of her journalistic colleagues). Please enjoy Maureen's, as usual, thoughtful piece, on the link below.
Cheers!
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/08/opinion/08dowd.html?ei=5070&emc=eta1
Read full post
Martin on Risky McCain
Dear friends,
Roland Martin is a serious journalist/thinker who is contributing to the direction of the dialogue in American journalism. I totally support his views and position on the link below. Cheers!
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/martin.townhall/index.html Read full post
Roland Martin is a serious journalist/thinker who is contributing to the direction of the dialogue in American journalism. I totally support his views and position on the link below. Cheers!
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/martin.townhall/index.html Read full post
Monday, October 6, 2008
In what direction should voters be going?
Dear friends,
I have seen this particular writer's work before. His name is Dick Polman of the Philadelphia Imquirer. However, while I can only recall having ever really connected with him - maybe once or twice, I am quite eager to share this beautiful piece with you, on the link below. For, at least to me, it is both very informative and equally thought-provoking. Enjoy!
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/currents/20081005_The_American_Debate__HERE_WE_GO_AGAIN.html?adString=inq.currents/currents;!category=currents;&randomOrd=100508090325 Read full post
I have seen this particular writer's work before. His name is Dick Polman of the Philadelphia Imquirer. However, while I can only recall having ever really connected with him - maybe once or twice, I am quite eager to share this beautiful piece with you, on the link below. For, at least to me, it is both very informative and equally thought-provoking. Enjoy!
G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/currents/20081005_The_American_Debate__HERE_WE_GO_AGAIN.html?adString=inq.currents/currents;!category=currents;&randomOrd=100508090325 Read full post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)