Michael Baisden's "Million Mentors" national tour - Worthwhile or Worthless? (originally posted 6/17/10)

"“You gotta tell the children the truth. They don’t need a whole lot o’ lies…‘cause one of these days, baby, they’ll be runnin’ things, so when you give ‘em love, you betta give it right…woman and child, man and wife, the best love to have is the love of life.,,pass it on.” – Jimi Hendrix"

Dear friends,

The present on-again, off-again national tour for a “million mentors” that is being sponsored by radio personality Michael Baisden about recruiting men to "mentor", especially, African American male youth in America is, obviously, well-intended. Yet, aside from signing up a bunch of “men”, is there really a plan?

That is, what type of “role models” should the aforementioned youth admire and aspire to replicate? For example, should they be like either Tyler Perry or his alter ego “Madea”? Or, perhaps, they can mimic another self-hating “comedian” named Steve Harvey who tells so-called “jokes” like, "I know a woman who is so black that when she puts on a yellow dress, she looks like a traffic light.” Moreover, what good is “mentoring”, if it has nothing to do with helping youngsters appreciate the inner powers of mental and physical stamina (i.e., energy), so that they can strengthen their communities?

Clearly, this whole state of affairs requires us to address the inadequacies and insecurities that hinder us from developing, honing, and maintaining those inner strengths/powers mentioned above - throughout life.

To be sure, most people are not even aware of their inner powers. Instead, they relinquish such strengths, in order to embrace the cuddly pillows of external authorities such as “public opinion”, “common sense”, or the world-ruling personality called “God”.

Nevertheless, how does recognizing one’s inner powers provide him or her with a vision that will be beneficial to the community? And what relevance does that vision just mentioned have to both the proliferation and continued evolutionary growth of the community? Additionally, since a realizable vision demands having a plan for the future, will that foresight foster rational faith and hope. And, most of all, will the young charges learn to practice love as an “act of being” that is geared towards other people, along with things like their studies, their work, and all that comprises enhancing the progress of their communities, as opposed to practicing love as the passive and sentimental “state of being” that silly Hollywood tv and movie productions and countless cheap popular songs on the radio portray?

Of course, none of this means very much to a young person, because only after experiencing many favorable and unfavorable circumstances during life’s journey will they be able to understand and appreciate the necessity of planning ahead, so that they can somewhat control their destinies.

That’s why it’s so important that parents. school teachers, and all other adults who come into contact with young people make sure that young folks have regular experiences with success. That will give them confidence. And, as we already know: confidence gives self-esteem a place to grow.

To be sure, there is a generation raising children that is so steeped in this possession-oriented culture that ideas of community, and so forth, represent the folklore of generations past. Additionally, it is hard to steer the imagination towards humanity, community, and the common good in a society that holds individualism as paramount. Individualism has its place, but given too much emphasis, it can encourage greed, selfishness and petty materialism, creating serious identity problems along the way. For instance, there already exists a vulgar mimicry of genuine individualism that has young African American males wearing pigtails, earrings in each ear, along with placing jewelry and tattoos at bizarre points on their bodies.

This all, of course, relates to the industry created by the so-called "hip-hop" genre of music which a genuinely accomplished musician, Wynton Marsalis, and a noted journalist and music critic, Stanley Crouch, have so adequately labeled hip-hop as being nothing more than "buffoon minstrelsy".

Initially, rap music had a revolutionary potential, with lyrics, by groups like Public Enemy, which sought to articulate the social conditions of urban youth. Unfortunately, before long, greedy record companies convinced equally greedy young folks to produce recordings without using either musical instruments or dignified lyrics (with the latter still calling what they produce "music", mind you).

Some of these new "recordings" focused on the childish narcissism and selfishness in which people with low self-esteem engage, as they try to convince themselves that they have worth. Others, mostly young African American males, attempted to gain their self-worth at the expense of others, using sexual infidelity and violence as proof of their manhood, in their "lyrics". None of these behaviors has been abandoned by either the so-called artists or record distributors of the "hip-hop" industry , as of this writing. Thus, for the most part, the revolutionary potential mentioned above has all but dissolved, except for, perhaps, a very tiny group of independents (mostly called "underground").

Several years ago, on C-Span, I saw Lerone Bennett Jr., the great historian, speaking at an academic conference of some sort about his dismay with our young Black "rappers" and their "fans" who are calling their mothers, aunts, sisters, daughters, and cousins "bitches and hoes". No other cultural group does that in the whole world, be it the entire music industry or the general public - only African Americans. This brings us back to the issue of self-hatred, as in the case of Tyler Perry and Steve Harvey. Worse yet, the so-called hip-hop moguls who receive so much publicity these days are no different than the Black slavemasters of the ante-bellum South. In fact, it is not an exaggeration to suggest that the former are the "spiritual" descendants of the latter.

Nevertheless, connecting to institutions where youth already participate, rather than trying to form new ones, is essential, for any hope of success. Church youth groups, school clubs, athletic teams, specialty learning centers (like boxing, karate, art, trade schools, and so forth), as well as college groups will all have interest in community service on some level, whether for positive publicity or to give concrete application of their principles. Eventually, even gangs could be convinced to act more as social clubs, giving their members a more positive sense of purpose.

By the way, instead of being “anti-gang”, perhaps, we should consider getting gangs to identify with positive behavior, at least, under some circumstances. After all, who would have ever thought that the famous biker gang known as the “Hell’s Angels”, originally out of California, would be connected to philanthropic activities, although their name continues to, sometimes, be connected with criminal activity? Even the infamous Blackstone Rangers of Chicago, at one point, became known for actions other than their violent ones. This can happen with the Crips and Bloods, as well.

Still, for all that has been discussed thus far, the proverbial bottom line is: Capitalism has been so attractive, because it is, thus far, the only type of economy that has afforded total political freedom to its perticipants, as workers. That means that a person can "flip the boss a bird", as it were, and walk away, being "free" to find another opportunity for employment. This was certainly not the case in either slave or feudalistic societies. Socilaist countries do not allow that kind of freedom either, since everyone works for the "State" and, therefore, must work where he or she is assigned, more or less.

The downside of total political freedom for workers within the capitalist political economy is: The "market” then controls all economic and, , social relationships, based upon the notion of "supply and demand", whether for the human commodity - labor, or non-human ones (commodities). Unfortunately, since, the end of World War 1 or so, the "market" has taken control of what we see as culture. As a result, the definition of culture, which historically, has referred to all of the actions by a specific population group, has become anything that the market determines it to be. Consequently, the notions of “youth" culture (clothing, hairstyles, piercing and tattoos, books, magazines with ads sold in them, and so forth), "Hip-hop" culture (drugs, guns, gangs, and so forth), and “gay" culture (weddings, nightclubs, exclusive recreational venues, magazines and newspapers with ads sold in them, and so forth), are, totally, market constructs. Additionally, while there are social constructs like race, age, and gender, for example, those social structures were not created for the appetite of the market. Rather, they serve the purpose of establishing social relationships within that society itself that will allow it (said society) to last for hundreds or even thousands of years.

Still, the idea that a culture can develop without any connection to the past (except its increased availability of consumables) is a contradiction in terms. Hence, the notion of "youth culture", for example, is designed to exploit the vast and seemingly endless energy and enthusiasm of young people. Yet, it seems, at least, to me, that the energy and courage of our youth should, actually, serve the purpose of moving society forward - but only under the guidance of that part of society (parents and other elders) that has both the experience and understanding to recognize the values that maintain both our humanity and spirituality.

Moreover, once the market is allowed to define culture, our only values become those which drive it (the market). For that reason, the mentality needed to function within the market system itself, has a great deal to do with causing the people in this society, for the most part, to not have the ability to act in a loving way towards each other, since it defines people by price or money-name. Hence, terms like low-income and wealthy become the false abstractions, like so many other monikers, that tend to sort out and classify people, then assign said folks to their stations in society and life, with most people never having any real control of their destinies

Therefore, and ultimately, if our youth are to be our future, then it will only happen if we as adults, particularly parents, take the reins of this present culture and provide our children with both an historical and social conscience, and set the example for them, by informing identity through the recognition of the connection between generations and defining human life in a meaningful way (as opposed to basing who they are upon unproven claims, regarding with whom they are having sex, or what "gang colors" they're wearing). That way, our society will benefit from the "leadership" of our youth. As well, the "market" will then be a function of the values of the society and not vice versa.

Let’s face it; culture has no meaning once taken out of the context of a reproductive process. A people who cannot reproduce themselves as a people will cease to exist as a people and become part of something else. This is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself. For example, the culture that held Africans in slavery, in this society, could no longer reproduce itself in that form and had to change, because of the well-deserved hostility and resistance it engendered.

In any case, let us stop asking children what they want to be, in the context of what they will possess, when they grow up. Instead, let us ask, what they want to be, regarding their relatedness to others. Let us ask, "How will you help the community when you grow up?" Let us ask, "What kind of work will you do to help people when you grow up?"

So, mentoring has significance, if it reflects a part of the culture of any particular community. However, social constructs like “race” and “gender” obscure opportunities for guiding young people so that they will be able to adequately replace us and prepare the way for those who have yet to come. Besides, what does either skin color or gender have to do with sharing vital information and skills with a young person? Therefore, however well-meaning, a “Million Mentors Tour” is a total waste of energy and valuable resources, unless its purpose is to direct youth towards embracing the notion, with a great sense of love, that they have a vested interest in building their communities for themselves and all of those who will follow them. Dig?

One Love,
G. Djata Bumpus