Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts

Friday, March 6, 2009

About Chris Brown and Domestic Violence, from a boxer's perspective

“If someone loves you, then the only response that s/he has when angry with you is to simply cut off communication. In other words, s/he does not speak either to or with you. The thought of violence from either side, is never an issue... if someone initiates violence towards you, regardless of their relationship to you, whatever you thought your relationship was, you were wrong – and you better make that person be the one who screams for the cops.”

Dear friends,

Back in the Fall of 1997, I attended a conference at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, that was focused on the effects of the, at the time, newly-legislated welfare reform on domestic violence. In other words, the main concern was: Would women stay in an abusive relationship, since they would no longer be able to get help (welfare) for their children. In order to contribute to the dialogue, I delivered a short paper there that was based upon my experience as a boxer.

The main point of my thesis was, and still is: Batterers are weak men who delude themselves into thinking that they are champion boxers, for a moment, when dealing with females. For instance, when a boxer confronts an opponent, that fighter does not just say to himself or herself, "I'm gonna knock this person out." Rather, s/he is thinking, "All right, I'm gonna move side-to-side, then jab to the belly, and come up and jab to the head." Or, “I’m gonna weave under the jab (of the opponent), then come up and hit him/her with a left hook on the chin.

Boxing is about "controlled fear". Both fighters are aware of their possible defeat, so they come out with their hands up, in order to protect themselves. They never come out with their hands by their sides (i.e., down). It's all about control.

Moreover, as the rounds go on, each fighter is trying to gain control of the space (i.e., the ring), so that the opponent can be more easily controlled. If the fighter is more of a “runner” like, say, Muhammad Ali or his daughter Laila, then, in order to control the space, one must be a slugger or “banger”, like Joe Frazier or his daughter Jackie and “cut off the ring” (i.e., get the person against the ropes), if success is the intention. So, in boxing we say, “You fight a boxer and box a fighter.”.

Otherwise, if not “cut off”, the runner will dance around and dart in and out, landing punches. Either way, each boxer must be patient, in the face of danger, and use a variety of techniques in the attempt to attain control.

Likewise, the man who normally seems like such a nice guy, and who, in fact, seems like the most unlikely person to be a batterer, suddenly, sees himself as a boxer. In other words, in a dispute with a female, he finds himself in a situation where he feels that he can "control" the situation with violence, if nothing else is working. After all, usually, women are not socialized to "hit" much less hit back.

So this normally “nice” guy, suddenly, in his own mind, turns into Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, or Mike Tyson for that matter. Just as the boxer thinks about the next move by saying, “I’m gonna hit the chin with a right cross and come back with a left hook.”, the batterer, either standing, or in the case of Chris Brown sitting with whatever kind of look on the face, says to himself, “If she says that again, I’m gonna knock her upside her head.” In other words, he feels that he is in "control", like a boxer is against an opponent. To be sure, that same guy (batterer) would never think of doing that with another male (unless the guy was half his size and had a docile personality). But at this moment, he is “in control”.

So Chris Brown is a loathsome coward. Can he change? We should hope so. However, he should do that with someone other than Rihanna, the young girl who comes from the land of my grandparents. The fact that he has so quickly resorted to another form of control to “win” her back is both pathetic and sad on Rihanna’s part, but that pitiful fact is also true of all of her male relatives and so-called “friends” who have allowed Brown to be able to walk around without crutches still.

In any case, he should, at least, be tried for “obstruction of justice”, since it is unlikely that she will testify against him now, since he has, deliberately, conned her into keeping him out of the slammer, by getting her to “reconcile”.

Finally, as I teach and have taught each of my students (some 2600 - with over 500 of them female) and have been doing so for a living, since 1988, “If someone loves you, then the only response that s/he has when angry with you is to simply cut off communication. In other words, s/he does not speak either to or with you. The thought of violence from either side, is never an issue. However, if someone initiates violence towards you, regardless of their relationship to you, whatever you thought your relationship was, you were wrong – and you better make that person be the one who screams for the cops.” Dig? That is what I taught my son and both daughters (the youngest has sparred with Jackie Frazier), starting all three - now adults - on each of their second birthdays.

G. Djata Bumpus
Read full post

Sunday, February 8, 2009

What's up with Etta James calling President Obama's ears big?

"...if Etta James is so caught up on Obama having big ears, then why did she marry a “white" man? To be sure, Bob James has big ears..."

Dear friends,

I normally do not bother with the stupidity of folks in the entertainment industry. However, recently Etta James, a popular singer of old, made a comment about President Obama that should be challenged. She made a disparaging remark about Obama's "big ears".

Actually, Etta James has a nerve, since she married a "white" man named Bob James - a great musician (James is his surname- not hers). The fact of the matter is: Obama's mother was "white". Europeans have larger ears than Africans. That's a physiological fact! The next time you have a chance, look at ANY European American's ears. They are bigger than those of African Americans. Period. It was a natural part of coming from a cold climate that they have large ears (to help deal with the cold). Black folks have small ears compared to "whites".

Moreover, due to the historical “mixing” between Africans and Europeans, there are some African Americans with larger ears than their European American counterparts. Therefore, if Etta James is so caught up on Obama having big ears, then why did she marry a “white" man? To be sure, Bob James has big ears, just as Africans have kinky hair. The kinky hair kept us from getting caught up in the large amounts of vegetation of warm climates.

At any rate, at least to me, Etta James chumped herself off, by saying something so stupid. She hates her Blackness. Beyonce merely represents a mirrored image of Etta's own self-hatred of being Black. That's her problem. Still, I'm proud of Beyonce. It's just unfortunate that neither she, Jay Z, or her parents know much about human physiology or their people.

One Love.,
G. Djata Bumpus
Read full post

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Craig's List Follies




I once used it to unload an old but still-serviceable dresser, and I have a friend who actually landed a rather desirable TV job through what's basically an Internet grab bag. ..





Hey folks,

For a little change of pace, here are a few wisely-expressed words of entertainment for ya, on the link below, from a very special Philly person who stays in the know.

Cheers!

G. Djata Bumpus
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/features/20081204_Jenice_Armstrong__Be_careful_what_you_post_on_the_Internet.html?adString=pdn.entertainment/features;!category=features;&randomOrd=120408030346
Read full post